The decision in filartiga led to a dramatic rise in. Beyond the alien tort claims act northwestern pritzker school of. Pena irala1 held that a deliberate act of torture committed in paraguay by a paraguayan official against a paraguayan citizen violated the international law of human rights. Torture as tort available for download and read online in other formats. Assuming the filartigas ultimately were able to obtain a. A suit claiming that penairala d had tortured filartigas p decedent to death while he was a police insp.
Fanny irala ac 19874 landau, mihalakos and freedman, js. Civil liability of corporate and nonstate aiders and abettors of international terrorism as an evolving notion under international law. Joel filartiga and dolly filartiga charging former paraguayan official americo penairala with the wrongful death of joelito filartiga. The filartigas brought this action in the eastern district of new york against americo norberto pena irala pena, also a citizen of. The growing importance of customary international human. Rise and fall of universal civil jurisdiction project muse johns. Pena irala is the paradigm for studying private torture claims against foreign officials in the united states. As with many landmark decisions, the importance of the opinion in the filartiga v. It is more likely to find its place as a legal oddity picked up in but see.
The court of appeals was able to extend its jurisdiction under the alien tort claims acts of 1789, the 1980 decision of the second circuit in filartiga v. Dolly filartiga has never forgotten the words barked at her early one morning 28 years ago. Penairala, the first successful case to invoke the statute, opened the. The complaint alleged torture of the plaintiffs brother see below leading to his death.
It set the precedent for united states federal courts to punish nonamerican citizens for tortious acts committed outside the united states that were in violation of public international law or any treaties to which the united states is a party. His daughter, dolly filartiga, arrived in the united states in 1978 under a visitors visa, and has since applied for permanent political asylum. The wellestablished universal prohibition of torture under international law, the court held, must be honoured in u. Pena irala, 6 which reimagined the ats as a basis for federal courts to address human rights abuses occurring. Federal jurisdiction over international human rights claims. A suit against penairala d on the premise that he had tortured to death the decedent of filartiga p, was filed by filartiga p. Court of appeals for the second circuit at the end of oral argument, submitted an important amicus curiae brief further explaining its views on the customary international law of human rights. Pena irala, which paved the way for a new conceptualization of the ats. At the same time, the court also granted certiorari in mohamad v. Posts about filartiga v penalrala written by africlaw. Shifting the lens on alien tort statute litigation 149 the complex relationship of the stroessner and marcos regimes with the usa. For a sister, court fight stirs memories of paraguay. However, cil has been prominently used in the human rights arena and has been interpreted by us courts.
On appeal from the court of common pleas of clark county. Filartiga and joel filartiga, plaintiffsappellants, v. Filartiga, arrived in the united states in 1978 under a visitors visa, and has since applied for permanent political asylum. United states court of appeals for the second circuit 630 f. Pena irala established the idea that domestic tort suits might be brought under the alien tort claims act atca against those accused of violating human rights norms. It thus extends the jurisdiction of united states courts to tortious acts committed around the world. Supreme court has granted certiorari in the alien tort statute ats 1 case of kiobel v. The center for justice and accountability cja is a us nonprofit international human rights organization based in san francisco, california.
The us can be bound by customary international law internationally, but the effect of cil in the us courts and in relationship to us federal law is uncertain. Pdf torture as tort download full pdf book download. Eichman v attorney general of israel, supreme court decision case concerning the temple of preah vihear certain expenses of the united nations article 17, paragraph 2, of the charter. To the contrary, this article exposes how filartiga and marcos recast as entirely foreign vio lence in which the us executive was deeply involved. Pena lrala2 has helped to set united states judicial policy on a course of reform. Penairala dean rusk the decision of the second circuit court of appeals in the filartiga case probably will not stand as a landmark case with farreaching implications for the development of international law. Pena irala is related with the death of seventeen year old boy under due to the torturer of the police under custody. Unlike traditional casebooks, this book emphasizes the. A suit claiming that pena irala d had tortured filartiga s p decedent to death while he was a police insp.
But what is the legacy of this case in an era of military privatization. In 1980, however, the second circuitthe first court of appeals to expound on section 50held that a damages action could be brought under section 50 by paraguayan citizens against a paraguayan official for the alleged torture and killing of a family member in paraguay. This will assist inquiries into its judicial jurisdiction and choice of law, and it will make filartiga type cases more understandable and therefore more. Joel filartiga s, a paraguayan doctor, sons custodial death due to torture in police custody. Filartigas legacy in an era of military privatization by. The filartigas brought this action in the eastern district of new york against americo norberto penairala pena, also a citizen of paraguay, for wrongfully causing the death of dr.
Pena irala,2 the united states, pursuant to a request by the u. Pena irala the united states court of appeals for the second circuit in filartiga v. Springfield, clark county prosecutors office office of the. Pena irala, wherein us courts were allowed to try human rights violations committed abroad even when both the torturer and the victim were foreigners or in legalese, without any jurisdictional link to the forum. That is because the criminal courts of many nations combine civil and criminal proceedings. The court of appeals held that deliberate torture perpetrated under color of official authority violates universally accepted norms of the international law of human rights, regardless of the nationality of the parties, and that 28 u.
Pena irala opened the door for the use of the ats for aliens to assert jurisdiction in federal court for human rights violations and other. Federal jurisdiction of alleged torturer under the alien tort. For example, in filartiga v penairala, a case concerning a claim for damages for alleged torture of a. View homework help filartiga case brief from posc 4470 at clemson university. Joel filartiga, a physician, describes himself as a longstanding opponent of the government of president alfredo stroessner, which has held power in paraguay since 1954. For purpose of the allen tort statute, torture may be considered to violate law of nations. It set the precedent for united states federal courts to punish nonamerican citizens for tortious acts committed outside the united states that were in violation of public international law the law of nations or any treaties to which the united states is a party. Filartiga v pena irala pdf free download as pdf file.
The government of paraguay, because of his efforts to help poor and. Alien tort claims act united states 1789 britannica. A new name will once again combine interstate law with the common law of. District court for the eastern district of new york, filartiga v. A suit claiming that pena irala d had tortured filartiga s p decedent to death while he was a police inspector general, was brought by. Troutman sanders and pepper hamilton have agreed to merge effective april 1, 2020. Federal jurisdiction of alleged torturer under the alien tort statute filartiga v. Enforcement of international human rights in the federal. Supreme court has granted certiorari in the alien tort statute. Pdf civil liability of corporate and nonstate aiders and. Shifting the lens on alien tort statute litigation. Pena irala1 case has little to do with the parties involved. Court of appeals for the second circuit decided filartiga v. It has made clear that abusers of internationally defined human rights from other countries who find themselves in the united states can be.
The landmark case pioneered the human rights application of a previously littleused 1789 federal statute, the alien tort claims act, which gives foreign nationals the right to sue for wrongful actions that violate international law. Filartiga held that a paraguayan police inspector who had come to the united states could be sued under the ats for torture he committed in paraguay. Pena irala the facts of the case this case is related with dr. As the paradigm, the filartiga action must be succinctly defined. Are there available legal responses to what we might call the privatization of torture. The ats remained dormant nearly for two centuries until it spectacularly entered the stage before 2nd us circuit court of appeal in a filartiga v penairala wherein paraguay citizens were allowed to sue a former paraguayan police officer allegedly involved in an extrajudicial killing of a paraguayan dissidents son in paraguay. Federal jurisdiction, human rights, and the law of nations. Argued september 14, 2001officially released march 5, 2002 james a. Pena irala, one of the most significant examples of human rights litigation in the u.
Pena irala which recognized jurisdiction under atca and held that torture comes under the umbrella of the law of nations, andthe torture victim protection act, which codified the filartiga. The filartigas brought this action in the eastern district of new york against americo norberto pena irala 4 pena, also a citizen of paraguay, for wrongfully causing the death of dr. Penairala that the atca could be used to sue a paraguayan police officer for acts of torture that he had committed in paraguay. The suit was brought by an alien residing in the united states against a former official of paraguay then visiting the united states. Professor william aceves engaging new volume the anatomy of torture. The meaning and scope of the law of nations in the.
In that case, 9,500 human rights victims filed suit against the marcos estate, citing a leading 1980 american case, filartiga v. International law as the rule of decision richard a. Filartiga case brief filartiga v penairala1980 1 court a. In the supreme court of ohio state of ohio, appellee, case no. In 1976, the father of a young man who had been tortured and killed in paraguay while in police custody witnessed one of his sons torturers walking the streets of manhattan. Universal civil jurisdiction under international law ejil. The landmark case pioneered the human rights application of a previously littleused 1789 federal statute, the alien. The first case brought under the ats for human rights abuses was filartiga v. Founded in 1998, cja represents survivors of torture and other grave human rights abuses in cases against individual rights violators before u. The supreme court seems to have settled on the last term, as does this article. Penairala, involved a paraguayan family that successfully used the. Get free access to the complete judgment in filartiga v. Joel filartigas, a paraguayan doctor, sons custodial death due to torture in police custody.
661 1264 1124 207 1168 1034 1376 1330 20 344 1240 99 980 251 366 1426 1065 436 873 1464 82 890 348 716 1490 110 142 704 404 1073 744 1076 1317 1435 557 376 1296 219 578 814